What would Reagan Do?

“But we are not going to simply kill some people to say, ‘Oh look, we got even.’ We want to know when we retaliate that we are retaliating with those who are responsible for the terrorist acts.”

President Ronald Reagan, 1984.

This is the first in an ongoing series on what Ronald Reagan would be doing. On war, on the economy, on spending. Of course it is all speculation but we have his words and deeds to reference and we can juxtapose some interesting possibilities.

For example, if 9-11 had happened on Ronald Reagan’s watch what would the Gipper have done?

In fact, it is very likely that Ronald Reagan would have invaded Afghanistan. After all, they were harboring Osama Bin Laden and by Reagan’s thinking that would have made it a legitimate war. Leading up to his election he sent strong signals that he would attack Iran if the hostages were not released.

But it is very unlikely that he would have invaded Iraq. Reagan didn’t believe in collateral damage for thousands of innocent people. It was not his style or a part of his belief system. He walked away from Lebanon not because he was a coward but because he would not risk killing thousands of innocent people in order to get a few who were guilty. And he wanted to make sure that he was targeting only the guilty people.

Listen to his own words from 1984….

Reagan on terrorism and collateral damage.

And ah yes, I have my own reasons for admiring the former president:

Reagan on Doug Wead

82 Responses to What would Reagan Do?

  1. tex2 says:

    You may be right, but recall Saddam had a history of invading other countries, gassing his own people, and was the head of a nation, not a small group of undefined terrorists. Saddam had been thumbing his nose at about a dozen and a half U.N. orders to comply after he lost the first war, including concerns about redeveloping NBC weapons/training terrorists in Iraq in the post 9/11 environment, and had been targeting naval aircraft in the agreed to southern fly zone.

    The invasion wasn’t all about WMD, even though that’s what the press likes to focus on exclusively.

  2. dmreins says:

    Looking forward to this series.. thanks Mr. Wead!

  3. David Black says:

    Go ahead, tex, start complaining about the so-called ZOG influence on American foreign policy. You’ve already dropped racist slurs against Jews, so this would be the logical next step for you.

    Reagan was great in his time but he’s dead now. Forget about him.

  4. David Black says:

    What ZOG influence? The ZOG influence you paleo-cons and LOSERtarians constantly complain about.

    Perhaps you should check your favorite website for a refresher

    http://www.stormfront.org

  5. David Black says:

    “Maybe you don’t have a clue. I’m not a libertarian or paleo-con,”

    You’re certainly not a lib and you’re not a neo-con, so there’s really no other political stripe you can wear.

    99% of the people that post to this blog are paleo-cons and LOSERtarians.

    Don’t sell me on “Constitutionalist.” You are the same as paleo-cons and LOSERtarians. You just want to be called something different.

    It’s the same as a lib wanting to be called a “progressive.”

  6. tex2 says:

    I’m a conservative, and most closely relate to the term Reagan Republican.

    You, on the other hand, are a kike.

  7. David Black says:

    There’s no such thing as a simple “conservative” anymore. There are two definite factions. You’re either a neo-con or a paleo-con. You have to choose which one you want to be. Both factions hate each other and for good reason. neo-cons like me love Israel and paleo-cons like you hate Jews.

    You’re just a pissed off have-not white cracker with no voice or power in society. So you look for other have-not white cracker losers on the internet like Glen Bradley and form little communities of white cracker losers and make yourselves feel good knowing there are other nutjobs like yourselves.

    “Reagan Republican”? Sounds like someone is listening to too much Sean Hannity.

  8. tex2 says:

    I don’t hate Jews, just kikes like you. In fact, I have several Jewish friends.

    I don’t have to be forced by you into a specific category. I don’t hate either the neo or paleo-cons. Just kikes like you.

    I’m not pissed off, I have plenty of voice and power. Of course I would like more of each, but that’s life.

    Neo-con? Sounds like someone is listening to too much Alan Berg. Too bad someone hasn’t put you out of your misery.

  9. David Black says:

    The term neo-con has been tossed around for years in the media and in intellectual circles to characterize people like Bill Kristol and the American Enterprise Institute who drafted the Project for the New American Century in the early 90s. It’s hardly exclusive to one person whom I’ve never even heard of.

    I doubt you even know any Jews and I don’t believe you don’t hate them. All rednecks and hillbillies hate Jews, along with gays, blacks, Hispanics, and anyone who isn’t white.

  10. tex2 says:

    “The media” tosses a lot of terms around, and makes a mess out of a lot of them.

    Perhaps you should google the name and read my note again, kike.

    I doubt I care what you think, let alone whether you are right.

  11. David Black says:

    You claim you don’t care what I think, yet you keep responding to my posts. That’s how lemmings are prone to react, the same ones that need documents, ancient folk tales, religious hokum, and politicians to tell them how to act and think.

    Try leading your own life without the need for any of that nonsense. No politician has ever guided my thinking. A communist could be voted President and I’d still make it work for me because I’m clever and smart enough to work the system to my advantage.

  12. tex2 says:

    I don’t care what you think because you’ve demonstrated you’re a kike. I am providing a balanced view to your “kikeness.”

    Try minding your own business. I realized long ago you are interested only in yourself, that’s part of what makes you a kike. If someone like Hitler came to power here you would be dead. Let’s see whether you’re “clever and smart enough to work the system” with a bullet through your skull.

  13. David Black says:

    “Try minding your own business.”

    Hey, you’re the one posting to a world wide forum complaining about some stupid tools you were too dumb not to buy.

    You got burned, so deal with it. Who told you to get mixed up with MLM anyway?

    Where has your pissing and moaning about MLMs gotten you? Nowhere. You haven’t learned, have you? No one cares about you or your problems.

    “If someone like Hitler came to power here you would be dead.”

    And if I had pedals and wheels I’d be a bicycle … really, speculation like yours is ridiculous.

  14. tex2 says:

    Me and millions of others. I am dealing with it, and nobody told me “to get mixed up with MLM.” I was presented with a lie and didn’t realize it.

    I am dealing with it. It has gotten me somewhere, but you wouldn’t understand, because it involves more than just your favorite 3 words: me, myself, and I.

    Hitler didn’t care if you were a practicing Jew, the nationality is all that mattered to him….really, stupidity like yours is ridiculous.

  15. David Black says:

    “I was presented with a lie and didn’t realize it.”

    TRANSLATION: I was too clueless not to trust strangers, because I am an inbred hillbilly who never had a real education in my life.

    Life is all about self-preservation and survival at all cost. Where have you been, pal?

    Reading books of Hebrew folk tales and believing in mythical beings.

  16. tex2 says:

    That’s part of the problem, I did know my sponsor, but he didn’t know he was being lied to by his brother in law, who didn’t know he was being lied to by his doctor/partner. This is part of why it wasn’t just me who was ripped off, but millions of others.

    You described what YOUR life is all about, it isn’t what my life is all about. Never has been, never will be.

    Go to hell, kike.

  17. David Black says:

    “My sponsor” ? What kind of nonsense is that? It sounds like something that belongs in a 12 step program for drug or alcohol addicted losers.

    When are you saps going to learn that people are just no damn good?

  18. tex2 says:

    You sound like a kike.

    Most of the people I associate with are very good people, but it only takes a few bad apples to spoil the whole deal. Just like it only takes a few kikes like you to give the Jewish people a bad name.

  19. Glen Bradley says:

    I agree that Reagan would never have gone into Iraq. Even at the time, that invasion was apparently asinine.

    Say what you want, Bush was angry at “the middle east” as a whole; and really just wanted to * something up for the TV. “To send a message, to the next terr’ist”

    (lol, yeah, that when we are attacked we will spend the bulk of our resources on a wild goose chase. thanks guys!)

    Reagan was brighter than to play into the terrorists hands like Bush did. Now we got 10 times the enemies in the world, and they are all familiar with the business end of American fire.

    So, where does that leave us? Do you feel any safer today?

  20. David Black says:

    “Now we got (sic) 10 times the enemies in the world,”

    It’s better to be feared than to be loved.

    I felt safer when Bush was in office, not so much now as the current regime doesn’t want to use terms like “war on terror” and wants to release islamofascist scum from Gitmo.

    The Middle East is essentially a dung heap save for only truly great country in Israel.

    Reagan wasn’t a true warrior, but a cowardly diplomacist. Eighty three Americans died in Beirut in 1983 without any retaliation. He turned and ran.

    That’s not leadership.

    You don’t negotiate with terrorist scum. You kill them.

  21. David Black says:

    EDIT: The Middle East is essentially a dung heap save for only one truly great country in Israel.

  22. David Black says:

    EDIT: Nearly 300 servicemen were killed in the islamofascist attack on the multinational base in Beirut in 1983.

  23. tex2 says:

    Glen,

    Please address my comments from March 30th, because I disagree with your 20/20 hindsight view.

    Reagan didn’t turn and run, he had to first FIND the people responsible rather than kill innocent people in a “shotgun” approach, which isn’t an easy thing to do when the people doing the original attack blew themselves up.

    He was also president during the Cold War, and MAD was part of the equation. As I said before, Israel exists ONLY because of the U.S., let’s just hope it isn’t full of kikes like you, or I would include it as part of the dung heap.

  24. tex2 says:

    Mr. Kike,

    By the way, I mostly agree with your other points.

  25. I admire Reagan as much as any Republican. He is our idol and his presidency is seen as a golden age for republicans for good reason. However, the Republicans are going to have to move on soon. We need fresh blood to support in their own right – not because we can compare them to Reagan.

  26. tex2 says:

    I don’t think we have to get all choked up over Reagan, but it would probably be useful to consider WWRD (What Would Ronnie/Reagan Do) when confronted with an issue.

    For example, we know what he did when he came into office and the economy was a wreck, and it was about polar opposite from what Barry O is doing.

    Reagan’s actions resulted in a quick and sustained turn-around, and we had the Cold War spending noose around our necks. Barry’s actions look more like FDR, which didn’t work, as ONLY WWII stopped the Great Depression.

    Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
    GEORGE SANTAYANA

  27. David Black says:

    First of all, there are NO innocent Muslims in the Middle East. From birth they are taught to hate Jews and hope for the destruction of Israel.

    Any Muslim killed is one less potential terrorist.

  28. tex2 says:

    There may be a lot of Muslims that are taught to hate Jews, but not all of them. There are also Muslims who reject the hate teaching. The ones that do hate Jews are probably told all Jews are like you, even though you’re not even a Jew, you’re an atheist. Any kike killed is one less potential idiot breathing perfectly good oxygen.

  29. David Black says:

    Sorry to counter that inferior public school education of yours, but being a Jew is primarily a matter of bloodline, not belief in folk tales.

    Unless you have actually lived in Israel as I have, you can’t know.

    Your world view from Heehaw, Texas is rather limited.

  30. David Black says:

    Unless you have actually lived in Israel as I have, you can’t know what Muslims are really like over there. They are bloodthirsty savages who teach children in school songs that claim that Jews are devils.

  31. tex2 says:

    If being Jewish is based primarily on bloodline, why don’t the Jews simply move out of the Middle East and get away from the radical Muslims?

    I don’t have to live somewhere to be aware of what the children are being taught. Your demeanor is fueling the issue, and putting many real Jews at higher risk.

  32. David Black says:

    “If being Jewish is based primarily on bloodline,”

    To ME personally.

  33. David Black says:

    “Your demeanor is fueling the issue, and putting many real Jews at higher risk.”

    That’s correct. Right now, radical Muslim clerics in Iran are reading my posts on Doug Wead’s blog and becoming even more incensed toward Jews, more so than ever before, to the point where they are abandoning any hope of moderate reform in their jihad against the Western powers and Israel. (sarcasm)

  34. tex2 says:

    You didn’t answer the question, Mr. Kike.

    I’m glad you agree with my demeanor point. LOL

  35. David Black says:

    Obviously, the use of sarcasm (despite it being clearly stated) was lost on your inferior intellect.

  36. tex2 says:

    You STILL didn’t answer the question, Mr. Kike.

    I read your sarcasm point, I was trying to get under your skin, and obviously succeeded. LOL

  37. David Black says:

    “I read your sarcasm point, I was trying to get under your skin,”

    So you admit that your posts have no real purpose other than to antagonize others and to whine about your MLM failure (that no one cares about except you).

    Haven’t you noticed that no one is suporting your crusade?

  38. David Black says:

    Since you have such a short memory, Jethro, I’ll tell you again.

    I’m not going to present you with the opportunity to bore the posters of this blog any further with continued pleas for sympathy for your failures and your very obvious inability to accept personal responsibility for those failures.

    Her’s the bottom line … if Amway’s or Quixtar’s overhead is too much for you, then just get out and go back to your assistant manager’s job at WalMart.

  39. tex2 says:

    No, I admit a single post was designed to get under your skin. The general purpose of my responses to you are to demonstrate how stupid of a bully you are. LOL

    There are people supporting my “crusade”, but most people are too wimpy to speak out.

    I’ve taken care of the high overhead.

  40. tex2 says:

    Apologies, the above message is directed towards Mr. Kike.

  41. David Black says:

    I see, so now it’s being a bully to compel others to embody the most valuable of all conservative tenets … self-sufficiency … to be completely free from anyone’s influence and to be completely free from submission to external influences.

    I call it the Lemming Syndrome. You have it and so do millions of other Americans.

    You can’t be a true conservative if you subscribe to a religion. You can’t be a true conservative if you subscribe to a politician’s personal philosphy as gospel.

    You can’t be a true conservative if you have to ask others for help, either.

    I ridicule you because you make demands of others to explain why Amway/Quixtar has high overhead costs.

    You never figured out that you joined a business process of which you have little choice but to follow like a lemming.

    It’s not like starting your own business and building it from the ground up with your own resources.

    THAT’S how you build a real business. Franchises are for the birds. They end up telling you what to sell and how to sell it.

    They are nonsense and I would never listen to anyone short of the law how to conduct my own affairs.

    That’s why I ridicule you, Jethro. You are a lemming. You live to be led by others, because you don’t have the intelligence to live entirely by your own wits and letting the chips fall where they may.

    That’s the middle class is stuck in the middle class. They are too dumb to get out of their own way and really do something great.

    Don’t worry, I’m not singling you out. Others on this blog over the past year that expressed the same sickening dependence on philosphies and systems received the same treatment.

  42. tex2 says:

    Mr. Kike,

    I see, so now it’s being a bully to compel others to embody the most valuable of all conservative tenets … self-sufficiency … to be completely free from anyone’s influence and to be completely free from submission to external influences. —- That’s not what I was referring to. An example was the crap you were spewing with Glen a few days ago, telling him which Middle School he attended, and questioning whether he was a Marine, as if those issues even mattered in the topic at hand. What you describe is being a monk, not a conservative.

    I call it the Lemming Syndrome. You have it and so do millions of other Americans. —- I don’t, but millions of other Americans do. And you must be in charge of the Kike lemming line….LOL

    You can’t be a true conservative if you subscribe to a religion. —- BS.

    You can’t be a true conservative if you subscribe to a politician’s personal philosphy as gospel. —- I agree, principles are far more important than any person, which is why the U.S. Constitution is so brilliant.

    You can’t be a true conservative if you have to ask others for help, either. —- BS.

    I ridicule you because you make demands of others to explain why Amway/Quixtar has high overhead costs. —- You ridiculed others before I came along because you’re a kike. I know why the upline (NOT A/Q) has high overhead costs, it is called the tool scam.

    You never figured out that you joined a business process of which you have little choice but to follow like a lemming. —- BS. Why would I be doing what I’m doing if I’m such a lemming?

    It’s not like starting your own business and building it from the ground up with your own resources. —- That’s EXACTLY what I’m doing.

    THAT’S how you build a real business. Franchises are for the birds. They end up telling you what to sell and how to sell it. —- Franchises are created a LOT of rich people, which should make you pee in your pants, because for the kike, it’s ALL about the money.

    They are nonsense and I would never listen to anyone short of the law how to conduct my own affairs. —- That’s part of what makes you a kike.

    That’s why I ridicule you, Jethro. You are a lemming. You live to be led by others, because you don’t have the intelligence to live entirely by your own wits and letting the chips fall where they may. —- BS, see above, Mr. Kike.

    That’s the middle class is stuck in the middle class. They are too dumb to get out of their own way and really do something great. —- BS.

    Don’t worry, I’m not singling you out. Others on this blog over the past year that expressed the same sickening dependence on philosphies and systems received the same treatment. —- So, you have no philosophy or system?

  43. tex2 says:

    Mr. Kike,

    By the way, you haven’t answered this question, so I will repeat it and ask for an answer for the 3rd time:

    If being Jewish is based primarily on bloodline, why don’t the Jews simply move out of the Middle East and get away from the radical Muslims?

  44. David Black says:

    “why don’t the Jews simply move out of the Middle East and get away from the radical Muslims?”

    Why don’t you ask some Jews who live there if you are so interested?

  45. David Black says:

    “n example was the crap you were spewing with Glen a few days ago,”

    Why the hell do you care what’s said to Glen? Is he your family? I guess because he’s a dumb cracker like you from another Heehawtown, you feel you have to defend him.

    Glen was obviously lying about his background even when he presented with the evidence. His honestly and integrity is central to ANY issue being discussed.

    “So, you have no philosophy or system?”

    Yes, survival and self-preservation at most any cost.

    The US Constitution is politicians’ BS, just like the bible is pure holy roller BS. Both are designed to keep the rabble (i.e. people like you) at bay and to throw them a measly little scrap to think they have something to live for. To think that “the people” hold the power in the US is a joke. To think there is a “supreme being” watching over us is a joke as well.

    If you can’t see that then you truly are dumber than a bag of rocks.

  46. tex2 says:

    Mr. Kike,

    Because it reveals your character, or lack thereof.

    He’s not my family, unless you consider the non-kike population “family.”

    The problem is he clearly stated he did not go to the school you said, and it wasn’t central to the discussion anyway. You were trying to “out” him, and fell flat on your face, or ass, I can’t tell the difference with you.

    Yes, your “survival and self-preservation” outlook is well known.

    The U.S. Constitution allows you to spew your BS, you would be long dead in many other countries. You simply don’t comprehend or understand where you live.

    To think that you think is a joke as well. I could see that if I were dumber than a bag of rocks.

    P.S., this is the FOURTH time you haven’t answered the simple question. Talk about lack of integrity!

  47. David Black says:

    I presented evidence that Glen Bradley was lying about his background. I see you are in the same mode of denial as he was. He never thought that I would be able to dig up that kind of information on him. That was his mistake and lying about only compounded it.

    The person who is caught lying is the person who falls flat on their face, not the person who presents the damning evidence.

    You have a rather twisted sense of right and wrong.

    I guess you, too, are going to try and tell me that two Glen Bradleys of the exact same age grew up in the exact same dinky town like Youngsville, North Carolina. It’s not impossible, but highly unlikely, especially when the population in 2007 was only a paltry 738, according to this link:

    http://www.city-data.com/city/Youngsville-North-Carolina.html

    If that were so, he would have readily stated as much at the outset. But no, his repeated denials were the reactions of a guilty party. You see, poor Glen’s present anti-public school stance seems hypocritical in view of the fact that he attended one. Since it’s in his vested interest to avoid such a past association, he would naturally deny it when confronted.

    You aren’t married to an attorney for over thirty years without learning to profile certain behaviors in people.

    As for your question, I answered it. I’m not going to explain what other Jews do or think, especially to anti-Semitic vermin like you. All I can say is that I unconditionally support their effort to preserve their nation’s future in the wake of islamofascist attacks.

  48. tex2 says:

    Mr. Kike,

    No, I responded who he is doesn’t even matter, it was the issues being discussed, not whether you thought you could “out” him.

    You have a rather twisted sense of right and wrong.

    I also stated I didn’t give up my right to criticize public schools just because I attended one.

    What I find amazing is you could be married for 30 years. She must ride a broomstick to work.

    I’m not anti-Semitic, I’m anti-Kike. There’s a huge difference. I already said I have Jewish friends, are you going to use your 30 years of being married to a lawyer, the source of many of our problems as a country, to find out I don’t have Jewish friends?

    Also, now it is obvious you are hiding in your Kike shell, unable to answer a simple question. I know if there were idiots lobbing rockets across the border at me, I would demand my government either wipe them out, or I would move. Period. You didn’t say squat in your answer, Mr. Kike.

  49. David Black says:

    “I also stated I didn’t give up my right to criticize public schools just because I attended one.”

    As I said before, you have the right to say whatever you want about public schools. You just sound like a hypocrite if you bash them after attending them.

    My wife is former IDF who at age 58 could probably wipe the floor with you.

    if you have as many Jewish friends as you claim, then you could easily bother them about this question that seems to perplex you so.

    Again, your motives are transparent. Like the question about MLMs being ponzis or pyramids, you’re looking for a pretext to somehow connect my atheism to the belief that Israeli property rights are based on books of folktales.

    I say the State of Israel was a rightful piece of compensation for the Holocaust. Ancient Judea seemed to be a logical place to locate this State because of ancestral claims. I never had a problem with that.

  50. tex2 says:

    How stupid are you? Someone who attended public schools should be MORE familiar with whether the education they received was good or bad. Someone isn’t a hypocrite simply because they say something they have direct experience with should be improved. Take my experience with you, a kike. I am in a great position to comment on your idiocy.

    I doubt your wife would get past my 45 magnum.

    I’m not perplexed at all, because I know the answer. For the other readers, the answer is real Jewish people (not atheist kikes, such as DB) consider Israel the promised land, given to them by the God Mr. Kike considers “ancient folk tales, religious hokum,” etc. That is the ONLY reason why someone would live in a place where rockets are lobbed into neighborhoods every single day. Nobody would otherwise logically live in a country constantly pummeled by “islamofascist attacks.”

    I only regret the Holocaust didn’t get YOUR mother, that way the world would be safe from you, a certified kosher kike.

  51. David Black says:

    “I doubt your wife would get past my 45 magnum.”

    They always say that men who wave their big guns in front of others mostly do so to make up for certain physical deficiencies.

    “I’m not perplexed at all, because I know the answer.”

    Yet you spent how many threads trying to pry an answer from me. Didn’t I call this one on the money? Your answer was predictable. Again, whatever reasons my people use to remain in their State is OK with me. As long as they keep killing Arab scum, I’m fine with that, too.

    “I only regret the Holocaust didn’t get YOUR mother,”

    Wow, and all because Doug Wead or I wouldn’t sympathize with your business failures. Your desperation to get attention knows no depths, does it?

  52. tex2 says:

    I don’t wave it, I squeeze the trigger. Multiple times, at the center of mass.

    Because I was trying to get either the real answer or a lie out of you. You provided neither, in typical kike fashion. The people in Israel are as much “your people” as the dentist on Seinfeld: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jG6B9Pt_ug

    That comment has NOTHING to do with Doug Wead, or my business. It has to do with having one more kike on the planet.

  53. David Black says:

    Wave, squeeze, no matter, it’s still to compensate for being under endowed.

    I think the readers of this blog can make up their own judgments about some loser who has to attack someone’s wife and mother to get attention.

  54. David Black says:

    “Multiple times, at the center of mass.”

    Sounds like someone is watching too many episodes of Gunsmoke. Yes, I checked your TVLand posts. I see where YOUR fixations lie. A shrink would have a field day with you.

  55. tex2 says:

    I doubt anyone, laying in a pool of their own blood and dead, is going to be concerned about the size of my dick.

    As opposed to you, who has to attack where someone went to school in order to even have an opinion about the school? Talk about loser, look in the mirror Mr. Kike.

    You’re the one who brought up your wife, by mentioning being married for 30 years (which STILL amazes me, by the way). When YOU brought up the Holocaust, it made me think of your mother, she must be SO proud of you. LOL

    Really? Where did the IDF teach your wife where to shoot? Or did she just cast spells? LOL

  56. David Black says:

    “I doubt anyone, laying in a pool of their own blood and dead, is going to be concerned about the size of my dick.”

    You tell ’em, Sheriff Dillon. Yeeeeeehaaaaaaaawwww!

    Gunsmoke? Elvis? John Wayne? That’s a redneck trifecta right there.

  57. tex2 says:

    I doubt anyone, laying in a pool of their own blood and dead, is going to be concerned about my name, either.

  58. David Black says:

    In your fantasies that compensate for your physical shortcomings, sure.

  59. tex2 says:

    It doesn’t compensate for anything, just to put kikes in their place.

  60. David Black says:

    You keep saying that, yet, I continue posting unabated, so your efforts are for naught, Sheriff.

    Now that I know that you are a TV addict it all makes sense. You can’t discern between fantasy and reality.

  61. tex2 says:

    Mr. Kike,

    Of course you keep posting unabated, that’s my goal. You don’t know how stupid you look, so you keep responding, which ensures everybody can see your stupidity on full display! LOL

    Just like bringing up my being a “TV addict”, which has NOTHING to do with the discussion. I didn’t realize Don Quixote was a kike. Or was his original name Don Quixoteberg? LOL

  62. David Black says:

    You are a TV addict, because your posting record on TVLand attests to that. Facts are facts. It’s the same in Glen Bradley’s case.

    I see it never occurs to you that repeatedly using a racial slur and attacking someone’s wife and mother casts YOU in a negative light, does it?

    You really have no self-awareness, do you, redneck?

  63. tex2 says:

    I’ve never looked at the TVLand site, let alone posted on it. But thanks for tilting at kosher windmills, Don Quixoteberg. LOL

    Not if your wife married, and your mother gave birth to, a pile of shit kike.

    I’m very self-aware, Mr. Kike.

  64. David Black says:

    Never looked at it? Oh really? You’re lying. This is you. It fits the profile of a redneck:

    http://forums.tvland.com/tvln/profile?user.id=3526

    People like you aren’t clever enough to vary your user IDs from one site to another. You practically beg to be outed. I’ve caught so many others in the past who never thought they’d be looked up.

    Also, your liberal use of foul language certainly isn’t galvanizing your image here, in case you didn’t know.

  65. David Black says:

    I mean, really, how much more redneck can you get? “Tonight is my bowling night” ???

    Gold Citizen tex2

    Gold Citizen

    02-11-2009 12:31 AM Posts: 533

    Registered: 08-30-2006 Message 4 of 18

    Viewed 360 times

    Thanks for the info Buck. Tonight was my bowling night but I am
    going to look at the Westerns Channel schedule and see if it
    doesn’t come on again. Thanks again.

  66. tex2 says:

    Sorry to burst your bubble Mr. Kike, that person isn’t me, but it’s nice to know you are off on a wild goose chase, like you were with Glen. LOL

    You need to check with your lawyer wife of 30 years and try again. Perhaps she’s looking into her crystal ball right now, finding out what Dorothy and Toto are doing! LOL

    I try to use Tex whenever I can, not vary my user ID. I often use tex2, or textex, etc., when a site already has a Tex user. I assume other folks using Tex do the same, and guess what, you found one of them. LOL

    You haven’t “caught” anything but a windmill blade, Mr. Kike Quixoteberg! But it sure feels real as you get swung around in circles! LOL

    Kike is actually a compliment for you, I just couldn’t think of anything more disgusting at the time. LOL

  67. David Black says:

    I guess this confirms the stereotype that hillbillies and rednecks are pathetic liars.

  68. tex2 says:

    No, it confirms kikes are Don Quixotebergs. LOL

  69. tex2 says:

    That’s it, you found me. I’m really Dave Robison! LOL

  70. tex2 says:

    P.S., did your 58 year old, lawyer/former IDF (Idiotic Dumb Female) who you have been married to for 30 years “help” you with this “investigation, Mr. Kike? LOL

  71. tex2 says:

    Oops, I didn’t close the parentheses after “investigation”, as I was wiping the tears of laughter out of my eyes. LOL

  72. tex2 says:

    P.P.S., how could I possibly watch TVLand, when this is MUCH more entertaining! LOL

  73. David Black says:

    David Robison of (I won’t mention the town) AL is a stand up comic and apparent internet performance artist who created this obnoxious and racist character “Tex” to harass people in the MLM biz.

    His website explains it all:

    http://www.ontheroadwithdave.com

    “Tex’s” blog:

    http://texsquixtarblog.blogspot.com/

    So essentially, this guy is a fake, a phony, and a fraud and I have proven it.

  74. David Black says:

    Dave, you’ve been exposed for the fake, phony, and fraud that you are. Why don’t you go back to telling bad jokes to your fellow hillbillies in Mobile?

  75. tex2 says:

    Mr. Kike,

    In case you didn’t notice, I am NOT Dave. Dave’s not here, man: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FR76YA7WncE&feature=related

    But keep trying, you’ve got me falling out of my chair laughing. Just like this guy, you are Cheech AND Chong! LOL

    I gotta run, “Gunsmoke” is almost on! LOL

  76. David Black says:

    You admit to your real identity on the link that I provided. You admit that you invented the character of Tex to post complaints about Amway and Quixtar to the texasquixtar blog you’ve been citing in your posts since you began posting here a week ago.

    The evidence is irrefutable. Funny how the moment I posted your name and the URL to ontheroadwithdave(dot)com that Doug suddenly started moderating comments.

    Why do you think he did that?

  77. David Black says:

    Wednesday, January 21, 2009
    Big News From Tex’s Amway Global Blog
    As most readers of Tex’s Amway Global Blog already know, the blog was started and written by yours truly, Dave Robison. I take comments made by “Tex” at other blogs related to Amway Global and Quixtar and add them as individual blog entries at “his” blog.

    “Tex” then responds in the comments section and adds his points. In the beginning, I called it, “surrogate blogging”.

    Today, “Tex” has posted his very first official blog entry. He is now a full-fledged contributor to his own blog. While I will still be the blog administrator and will still make blog entries(and edit them); Tex now has the power to write an entry under his own moniker and publish it to his blog.

    Congratulations, Tex, and welcome to blogging from the inside.

    Labels: Amway, Amway Global, Blogs, Quixtar

    posted by David Robison | 9:23 PM | 0 comments links to this post

  78. tex2 says:

    Why would I announce inventing a character named Tex that links his identity to me? LOL

    You’re a real piece of work, as long as a pile of dung qualifies for “art.” LOL

    I don’t know why Doug did that, but I DO know he doesn’t like to answer my Amway tool scam questions.

  79. tex2 says:

    Oops, looks like Doug isn’t moderating MY posts, just YOURS.

  80. David Black says:

    That period of time he was moderating didn’t last very long.

    “Why would I announce inventing a character named Tex that links his identity to me?”

    You had no idea anyone would bother to look you up. The game’s over, Dave.

    From your website http://www.ontheroadwithdave.com

    “As most readers of Tex’s Amway Global Blog already know, the blog was started and written by yours truly, Dave Robison. I take comments made by “Tex” at other blogs related to Amway Global and Quixtar and add them as individual blog entries at “his” blog.

    “Tex” then responds in the comments section and adds his points. In the beginning, I called it, “surrogate blogging”.”

  81. tex2 says:

    You need to find the information on Dave’s and other sites about the group that went to Prague last year, paid for by Amway. We are 2 different people, you little kike.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: