Huck And Mitt? Joined at the Hip!

 Neither can win in November without the other. 

The most interesting statistic to come out of the Nevada Primary tonight is the dismal 8% showing for Governor Mike Huckabee.  This shows what we all should have suspected that the Evangelical-Mormon estrangement cuts both ways.  And it sends a very clear message to both the Romney and Huckabee camps.  There is no way either one will win in a general election without having the other one on the ticket. 

Here is how it works.  Evangelicals in Iowa melted away from Mormon Romney, in spite of his huge expenditure in time and money.  They just wouldn’t vote for a Mormon.  The votes easily slipped to former Arkansas, Governor Mike Huckabee, an evangelical, and he carried the state.  But tonight, as one of the front runners, Huckabee should have enjoyed a nice showing in Nevada, a conservative-libertarian state where his tax ideas should be well received.  But, Mormon voters in Nevada, once confined to Utah and now a force throughout the Mountain States, are not biting for Huckabee.  What is good for the goose is good for the gander.  

It is easy to understand how this estrangement developed.  Mormons were rightly proud of their man, Governor Mitt Romney.  He was a classy businessman who turned around the Olympics, won the governor’s mansion in Massachusetts, a Republican victory in the heart of Kennedy territory, and last year took the lead in the polls for the first two GOP contests for the Republican nomination for 2008.  But after two years of campaigning, Romney saw his lead in Iowa evaporate as evangelicals melted away, supporting their own Mike Huckabee instead.  And then McCain beat Romney in New Hampshire.  Sensing that evangelicals were not going to accept him, Romney pulled his television ads in South Carolina and left the state to McCain and Huckabee.

In fairness to the evangelicals, and I am one, Mormon voters have long been suspect of evangelicals too.  As a candidate for congress in Arizona, my campaign leadership were all members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. They helped me win an upset primary victory.  But in the general election too many Mormons stayed home and it led to my defeat.  My Mormon staff sadly confided to me post campaign that my “faith” had been the deciding “negative” factor.

Mike Huckabee’s hope of winning the nomination is to carry the South and hope that McCain, Giuliani and Romney split the rest of the states.  Romney is counting on the west, California and a couple of more Eastern states.  But remember, the GOP delegate count is more loaded for the Southern States that traditionally vote with them in the general election.

In a general election, Huckabee could carry the south and nothing else if even a piece of the Mormon vote stayed home.  It is not a big vote but they are activists in key Western States where Democrats have been threatening in recent years with increased Hispanic voters.  Even if Huck carried Ohio, which would be tough, it would not be enough. The only way he could hope to win is to have Romney on the ticket and hope to sweep the South and Mountain States.

The whole scenario works exactly the same in reverse for Governor Mitt Romney.  If he wins the nomination he could find himself winning in many southern states but losing Tennessee, Florida, Kentucky, Missouri, key Border States, heavily laden with evangelical voters who make the difference.  Most would vote for him but enough would stay home to see those close states tilt into the Democrat column. The only way he could hope to win is to have Huckabee on the ticket, reassuring evangelicals.

The fact is that neither one will be in the mood to accept the second place at the GOP convention.  That’s why Huckabee and Romney need to meet now.  They need to have a gentleman’s agreement to work for the other if they lose.  Otherwise, they are both just spinning their wheels.  Neither one can win without the other.  They are joined at the hip.  Or, if you prefer, they are a match made in heaven.

4 Responses to Huck And Mitt? Joined at the Hip!

  1. raleyb says:

    This is the most brilliant anaysis anyone has put forward yet. Doug you should be on Fox News instead of the current talking heads. I typed an email to a friend supporting Romney. I’m supporting Huckabee. I had the same exact conversation with him last night after the Nevada and South Carolina results.

    I believe Huckabee will pick up the majority of the Thompson and Hunter voters in the south. I agree that neither candidate wants to play second fiddle, but there only possible hope would be a ticket together. As I’ve commented before, the only way I vote for Romney in the general is on a ticket with Huckabee.

    I wonder about your thoughts on McCain’s possible running mates if he wins the nomination. He and Huckabee have been very cordial, but Lindsay Graham seems so close to McCain.

  2. raleyb says:

    I am listening to one of your past tape sets on singleness of purpose in relation to the Jimmy Carter run for President.

    When Mike Huckabee came onto the scene as a nobody in Iowa and the country, it reminded me of your tape explaining the story of Jimmy Carter’s run.

    I would love to see a post where you compare and contrast the two campaigns.

  3. dougwead says:

    Hmmm. You’ve really got me thinking about how this all comes down with McCain winning the nomination? Who would be the running mate and how would it impact all of this?

  4. raleyb says:

    When your candidate loses momentum, which mine has, I guess you start supposition on who could win and what the ticket would be. It helps pass the time and relieve the pain. As a Christian it’s tough to not make your politics an idol during eleciton years. I still believe that Huckabee could have life with his unbelievable grassroots support.

    Fox News conjectured about Fred Thompson as VP for McCain. There was mention by Gingrich tonight on O’Reilly that Huckabee could win most of the southern states on Feb 5th (or at least pick up substantial delegates) and make a possible VP selection. Jack Kemp was lobbying hard for McCain tonight and he mentioned how involved his was with McCain economic policies. What an odd election year?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: