NSA tapes reveal White House sex scandal

June 19, 2013

So what are we to make of the NSA data gathering?  Is it okay for the government to snoop on us?  Does it keep us safer?  And what juicy secrets have they now found from a previous White House administration?

The government says, “Yes, the program is a necessary evil.  It will help us catch terrorists.”

But then, this is the same government who denied they were snooping on us in the first place.

Senator Wyden, ” Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?”

CIA Director Clapper answered, “No, sir.”

If they lied about what they were doing, at the risk of perjury, why should we believe them now?  When any answer could be very subjective?

And if spying on more than a hundred million phone calls and emails couldn’t help the NSA detect that one of its own employees was about to leak its secret snooping operation, how can we expect then to efficiently find terrorists?

As Ronald Reagan often said, “Remember, these are the same people who run the post office?”

What about the competence of a government that employs 4.2 million persons with security clearances while 43% of the American people believe we should be cutting back on programs that threaten privacy and only 20% think we should be doing more to fight terrorism, even at the expense of privacy?  Isn’t that a disaster waiting to happen?  If the leaker wasn’t Edward Snowden wouldn’t it have been someone else?

In an exchange between CNN’s Erin Burnett and former FBI counter-terrorism agent Tim Clemente, we are told that the content of all our phone calls is being recorded and stored, even if it is not audited.

Now we learn that “the National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.”

Then there is this from the chief technology officer at the CIA. “We fundamentally try to collect everything and hang onto it forever.”

Only days after the NSA story broke we learned that there is tracking of emails in real time.

The terrorists are not idiots.  If they hide behind civilians from drone attacks, why wouldn’t they hide behind civilians in the cyber war?  Implicating innocent others by false flag emails and phone calls?

Then there is the question, what will the government do with all of this information?  And what should it do?  Hunt for terrorists?  Find Edward Snowden? Purge its own “top secret clearance” list?

What about solving murders?  Locating abducted teenagers caught up in the sex slave traffic?

Most agree that it shouldn’t be used to go after “Joe the plumber?”  Remember him?  The average citizen from the 2008 election?  Surely not.  We shouldn’t go after the parish priest for sex abuse without first clearing the Bishops and the Cardinals.   What hypocrisy to prosecute or punish the little guy and ignore the sins of the powerful?

So let’s start at the top.  Think of all the problems we can solve?  We now have phone calls, letters and emails to show any link between the  IRS offices in Cincinnati to the White House. Why not reconstruct what happened?  We could exonerate or implicate the president and others?

First order of business? Have transcribers compose the massive conversations of the rulers of our country.  The Supreme Court, the Senate, the Justice Department, starting with the Attorney General, the Cabinet and the President.  Even past presidents.  No one should be in a position to pass judgment if they, themselves, are guilty of crimes.

There is the new scandal in the State Department, where their own whistleblower, Aurelia Fedenisn. is being intimidated for reporting sex crimes with minors, even an Ambassador involved.

Are there big shots accessing child pornography sites?  Why leave that task to Chris Hansen of NBC’s Dateline?  First let’s clear the people at the top.

Let us suppose that a presidential aide calls a friend of the president about a donor who wants to give a million dollars in soft money to a campaign?  And the aide tells him that the presidential candidate wants that million dollars in soft money to go to the NRA or some Catholic voter registration program.  And let’s suppose that the presidential aide is getting indirect kickbacks from the Catholic voter registration program?   And let’s suppose that the presidential candidate affirms his desire in later conversations.  It’s illegal right?

And let us suppose that the presidential candidate, worried about his crime, makes calls to destroy the career of the witness, let’s say he talks to a major network president and gets him banned from TV appearances which dramatically impacts his income.  Shouldn’t we know those kind of things first, before we go after  Joe the plumber?

And after clearing the top government officials, shouldn’t we clear the media too?  How hypocritical for them to hold the subjects of their reports to a higher standard.  Let’s know their own habits and words and crimes and biases?  We hear what they say in public, influencing millions, what do they say behind close doors?

How many stories are out there?  Waiting to be told?  And now we have the evidence to find them all.  Now we can apply equal justice.  If we persecuted Bill Clinton for his infidelity, now we can learn about the marital affairs of other more beloved presidents who weren’t so unlucky.  They had no Linda Tripp recordings but perhaps the NSA can fill the gap.

Shouldn’t someone know what the NSA knows?  Couldn’t the agency use its information to blackmail its superiors?  What about the Freedom of Information Act?  Doesn’t a US Senator, a Federal Judge, a President, have the right to know what conversations the NSA has and what is in them?  Things taken out of context can be dangerous.

If the existence of this program can be leaked to the public by a concerned citizen, when can the demographics of the program be leaked to a political campaign?  Has it already happened?  When can the details or content be leaked to companies or employers?  Wouldn’t you want to run a check before hiring?  Would you want to hire a  baby sitter who talks dirty on the phone?  Or an accountant who does  a Google search on how to embezzle money without being caught?  Or a chauffeur who is an alcoholic?

Cardinal Richelieu supposedly once wrote, “Give me six lines written by any man and I can have hung as a criminal”  Imagine what he could have done with the NSA?  He could have killed France.

Can you see the nightmare?  The injustice?  The conflict?  Can you see why the Founding Fathers wrote the Fourth Amendment?

Welcome to America, in its post constitutional drift.  When you start to violate your own Constitution, step by step, you become a nation without laws, where the ends justify the means.  It is survival of the fittest.  The powerful rule and will take from you what they want.

You can be sure of one thing.  The massive information collected by the NSA will not be used to hurt the rich or powerful.  Don’t hold your breath to learn what really happens in the lives of the people at the top.  They will continue their crimes and the flow of riches from the weak to the powerful will continue uninterrupted.

But Joe the plumber?  You, my friend, are in big trouble.

.

.
(If you want to learn more about Rand Paul’s Fourth Amendment Restoration Act S.1121 click here.)


The Obama Cover-up begins

June 11, 2013

What did the President know and when did he know it?

During Watergate, Senator Howard Baker made that question famous.  It was a different time, a different president and a different second term scandal.  But now, once again, the question is raised and it goes to the heart of the issue.  Was Obama behind the IRS attacks on his political enemies?  Or was it happening on its own, a bureaucratic “planchette,” moving across the political Ouija board with many biased hands guiding it?  And if it was the latter, when did the president finally know about it?

According to the Inspector General, the IRS asked illegal questions of politically targeted groups and organizations.  This included “requests for donor information, positions on issues, and whether officers have run for public office.” One disgusting national news story revealed that IRS agents had asked an organization to report the content of their prayers.

Now comes the shocking news.  The former IRS commissioner, Douglas Shulman, visited the White House 157 times since 2009.    Sarah Hall Ingram, the woman responsible for the IRS division that targeted conservative and constitutional groups, made 165 visits to the White House since 2011.  Incredibly, according to the official White House visitors’ records, none of the visits of the two IRS officials overlapped.

During those 322 visits to the White House, which represents almost every other working day, did they ever encounter the president?  And if so, what did they talk about?  Baseball?  Did they ever talk about work?

Did they feel comfortable about quizzing nonprofit applicants about their prayer language because they knew the president wouldn’t mind?  How could Barack Obama possibly not know what was going on?  When they met with him, did they lie to him?

Ken Walsh – arguably America’s preeminent authority on modern presidents – makes the point in a recent book that President Obama, as other presidents before him, may be isolated from what is happening in his own administration.  (Prisoners of the White House: The Isolation of America’s Presidents and the Crisis of Leadership. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder – London. )

As Walsh points out, presidents’ aides often give their boss some distance so he has deniability when a scandal erupts.  There is nothing new about this.  History has showed how sovereigns and mafia dons get things done without giving a literal command.  Frustrated over Thomas Becket, King Henry II supposedly bellowed, “Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?”  Aides figured out what Henry wanted and butchered Becket.

Having worked in a White House I personally experienced this first hand.  A good staffer knows when the president should not be bothered by something, when his fingerprints should not be on the paper.  But can one meet with the president hundreds of times and not talk about ones work?  Isn’t the president too busy to talk about life?  Or to quiz an IRS official about personal gossip at the agency?  Wouldn’t a chief executive want to know what she is doing and how she is doing it?  And would she really make hundreds of visits without the details of her work ever coming up?  What would be the purpose of the visits?

As Kenneth T. Walsh shows in Prisoners of the White House and I was to experience firsthand, isolation happens to all presidents.  But then so does hubris.

Even if one accepts the most generous account of President Obama’s innocence it does not explain how he continues to relentlessly reward and punish his enemies after the fact.

Sarah Hall Ingram, the administrator of the IRS division that targeted conservative groups, the one who made 165 visits to the White House and supposedly never uttered a word about what she was doing, was given a $100,000 bonus and promoted to run the enforcement of ObamaCare.

What is that?  Coincidence?  A payoff?

The president can claim he didn’t know when it happened, which seems far fetched, but he surely knows now.  And like Richard Nixon before him, he is paying off the Watergate Burglars.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 484 other followers