Romney’s Mistake

Presidential candidate Mitt Romney is making a big mistake by prolonging the discussion about his faith. Worse still, he and his staff don’t see it. Last week, Romney, a member of the Latter-Day Saints or Mormon Church, answered back the Rev. Robert Jeffress whose off camera comments apparently labeled Mormon’s a cult. Romney kept the issue alive in the Las Vegas debate. He would help himself much more by ignoring it all and letting others defend him.

For the moment it appears that the incident is a major plus for Romney and it must surely feel that way inside his campaign. Romney has been lovingly embraced by the national media who has risen up to condemn the Southern Baptist preacher. In general, the Southern Baptist Convention, the largest Protestant denomination in the world, is not very popular with the media. (Who can forget Christiane Armanpour’s documentary “God’s Warriors,” which likens religious right youth to Islamic terrorists, and is now watched on computers in the dorms of Christian Universities to howls of laughter.)

This defense of Romney must surely be a “feel good” moment for Latter Day Saints, who are too often targets of the very bigotry that the Jeffrey moment seemed to imply. But not so fast. The Saints should not break out the bottles of cranberry juice just yet.

Here is the rub. Romney doesn’t need the national media to win the nomination or the presidency. Reagan and both Bushes won without it. And it’s a good thing. Romney won’t get it no matter how many undeserved wounds he incurs in the internecine GOP contest. The national media had its best opportunity to be truly non partisan when their favorite John McCain won the GOP nomination last time. But McCain had no chance against the historic tide and media extravaganza of electing an African American president. So Romney’s moment will also be short lived. And his unwillingness to understand that speaks to his ongoing misunderstanding of evangelical numbers.

Here’s a short way to put it. He won a moment with the media, which he didn’t need and will be all forgotten in the general election and he lost a chance to win points with evangelical leaders of influence who only need to hesitate, not oppose him, just hesitate, to cost him the White House.

While the media continues to attack Jeffress, his fellow Southern Baptists cry foul. Pastor Jeffress moment of infamy, they say, was a little more complicated than it seems. Jeffress was baited by a journalist questioning him offstage. He was asked what most pastors think and he answered, as the messenger. The very next day the Washington Post ran a story about a poll of 1,000 pastors. 67% in the survey called Mormonism a cult. No one took the Washington Post to task, even though they too, like Jeffress were the messenger.

So what should Mitt Romney have done?

He should have remained silent, transcendent, Reaganesque, above the fray. Like Jesus before Pilate. As the Proverbs say, “It is an honor to overlook an insult.” It is what Barack Obama does daily. Romney should have let others in the evangelical movement come to his rescue.

It is very obvious what happened? Governor Romney must be exasperated with his slow acceptance in the evangelical community. His staff, who remember are on his payroll, probably encouraged him. “Answer back. Stand up. It will be a good moment. There is one thing that trumps religious doctrine with the American people and that’s leadership. It will be your Reagan moment. ‘I paid for this microphone Mr. Green.’ Or like George H. W. Bush standing up to Dan Rather. Jeffress will be Perry’s Jeremiah Wright.”

Bad advice.

Mark DeMoss, Romney’s evangelical adviser would know better but he may be so outnumbered that he is worn down or his counsel is outvoted, even discredited, by the inner circle. DeMoss is now trying play to the media stereotype. What can he do?

Privately, he surely told the Romney staff the truth. He would have said, “Look, the object is to get the nomination, not win points with the media.

“And as for any comfort to the Latter-Day Saints? If they think this hurts, wait until the general election, when Governor Romney faces the media’s beloved Obama. The journalists who champion the Governor today, will give his faith a baptism of fire. Remember Proposition 8? When LDS Churches were vandalized and the book of Mormon burned? Where was the ‘tolerant’ media then? You saw some hints of what the media will do in the New York Times last cycle.

“And don’t even think that this is a Jeremiah Wright moment? In the first place Rick Perry doesn’t go to Pastor Jeffress church. And in the second place, that church is First Baptist in Dallas, Texas. That’s the Vatican to the Southern Baptist Convention, the largest Protestant denomination in the world. And 90% of those Southern Baptists live in 14 electoral southern states, the richest electoral region of the nation.

“Just look at the math. 2% of the country are LDS. 12.6% are African-American. And 48% of the nation claim to be born again Christians.”

“It’s not that high,” Romney staffers will shoot back. “Our pollster says that only 26% of the population is evangelical.”

“But our pollsters are asking the wrong question,” DeMoss will try to point out. “Asking someone if they are evangelical” is like asking if they are phlegmatic. They may be, but you are going to get a skewed answer because some won’t know what you are talking about but won’t want to admit it. All they know is that they go to the Nazarene church, or Hillsdale Community Church down the street. But if you ask them if they are ‘born again’ they will say yes.”

The eyes of the Romney staffers will glaze over.

Abraham Lincoln once said that if he could find a general who could do the math he could win the war. He was so frustrated. How can you argue with numbers? The North had the industry and the population. They would win if they would just fight. In the political game, the born again Christians have the numbers. It doesn’t pay to dis them. Ask President Colin Powell, who for years could win any general election match up but not the GOP nomination because of one ill advised attack on evangelicals in a Barbara Walters interview.

It took many losses for the patrician, Episcopalian Bush family to figure out the political math of the born again numbers in this country. No matter how distasteful, you can’t win an election without them. But when the Bush family finally figured it out, they produced two governors and two presidents.

Romney’s fight with Jeffress shows that he and his staff haven’t yet gotten the math.

About these ads

6 Responses to Romney’s Mistake

  1. You’re giving Romney advice now?

  2. MdRonulan says:

    I felt Rick Santorum had the best answer in the debate the other night. In judging a person’s qualifications for president it would be better to look at the candidate’s character and how s/he applies their understanding of faith rather than what the candidate believes is the road to salvation.

  3. hs says:

    I have an off the wall question, and this is the only place around where the truth can be found–no matter what.
    I just read an article about a presidential contender by the name of Buddy Roemer. According to the article, he wasn’t allowed to participate in any of the dabates because he hadn’t raised enough funds.
    “Former Louisiana Gov. Buddy Roemer is a declared candidate for the GOP nomination and has yet to be invited to a Republican debate.”
    “I keep asking why I can’t get on stage, and the rules seem to change daily. First I had to reach 1 percent in polling, and when I reached that, they changed the rule to 2 percent, now they talk about needing 500,000 donations.”

    There’s more to the article, but that is the basics.

    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=357429

    Is this “strategy” legal? It is dscustingly ugly and, in my opinion, should not be allowed. It even makes all the candidates look like they would lose to this Buddy Roeman if he was allowed to air his platform.

  4. You can’t allow everybody who wants to run on the stage, there are probably too many there now. Buddy should have started earlier.

  5. hs says:

    That mkes sense. Thanks Tex.

  6. You’re welcome. I have a nasty habit of making sense and being logical.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 485 other followers

%d bloggers like this: